Some interlinear glosses in one manuscript are marginal in another, and one version of a gloss might be short in one manuscript but in another it might be lengthy. In the Oxford gloss, it is difficult to differentiate between glosses and scholia along the lines proposed by scholars for other corpora, such as position or length. In glossed Bibles, scholia would be notes added in the margins for teaching purposes, but not pertaining to the Glossa ordinaria, the corpus of glosses on the Biblical text standardized in the twelfth century (Morard 2017b). Glosses can be assembled in a separate commentary, and one can distinguish them according to a typology: prosodic, lexical, morphological, etc. Other scholars treat a scholium as a specific kind of gloss that is longer than average, and has an interpretative or explanatory nature. Tov lists even other types of additions, like interlinear and marginal corrections, exegetical elements, variant readings, or scribal remarks, but in the end he admits that it is difficult to distinguish between them. For most scholars, a gloss explains a particular word through synonyms or a brief definition, whereas a scholium treats a larger part of the text and provides part of a general commentary (Tov 2020, 41–42). Both designate marginal or interlinear notes. 1.1 Gloss or Scholion?ģThe term gloss is sometimes distinguished from the term scholion or scholium. Either an attachment sign was copied above the lemma and reproduced beside the gloss, or the lemma was repeated at the beginning of the gloss. Different techniques were used, even on the same page, to link a marginal gloss to its lemma, the word or phrase in the central text. Each manuscript therefore has both marginal and interlinear annotations, which are referred to universally as glosses, no matter the length or content. Most of the gloss was copied in the margins, which were designed to accommodate several columns of those notes, but a significant portion was placed between the lines. See this article for possible virtual machines to use.2The Aristotelian text was written in the middle of the page, in a large module.
#Youtube xmlmind install
Create a virtual machine for Windows or Linux and then download and install the Windows or Linux version of XLingPaper on it.If you already have FieldWorks Language Explorer (aka FLEx) installed in a Windows (or Linux) virtual machine, then download and install the Windows (or Linux) version of XLingPaper and use XLingPaper on that virtual machine.See this YouTube video for how you might do this. Then run XLingPaper in that virtual machine.
#Youtube xmlmind mac os x
Create what’s called a virtual machine on your Mac and install an older version of Mac OS X in that virtual machine.
Sign a petition asking Apple to support 32-bit apps on Catalina.So what can you do if you find you have or need Catalina? Here are some possibilities: Given the huge number of possible combinations of elements XLingPaper offers, such a process to check as many such combinations as possible is a large and time-consuming undertaking.
#Youtube xmlmind pdf
Our experiments have shown that using one 64-bit Mac version and its associated (newer) LaTeX macros often results in different PDF output or maybe even a failure to produce the PDF compared to the current 32-bit XeLaTeX and its associated LaTeX macros. At this time, we are not planning on doing the massive amount of work that would be required to switch to a 64-bit version of XeLaTeX and the LaTeX macros XLingPaper needs in such a way that we do not introduce bugs. This one is used when producing PDF (the default, XeLaTeX way). Most of the apps that XLingPaper uses are 64-bit, but there is one crucial one that is not. If you are using Catalina, you also will need to do some special steps to get the XMLmind XML Editor (that XLingPaper depends on) to run correctly. Apparently, starting with version 10.15.4, they are enforcing this so that if you try and run a 32-bit app, it gives a “Bad CPU” message. As many Mac users know, starting with Mac OS X 10.15 (Catalina), Apple has decided to no longer support any 32-bit apps.
0 kommentar(er)
